Compare Rankfor’s public plans

Which jobs does the team need to perform?

List recurring work before comparing prices. A team may need a brand baseline, audience coverage review, content planning and draft review. Another may also need repeated-answer experiments or more projects for client work. Give each job a frequency, owner and required output. Use that list to make the plan decision around the required capacity and workflows.

Separate required capabilities from occasional curiosity. If an audit requires repeated testing of material errors, that requirement should be explicit. If the team only wants to inspect a specific answer while evaluating the product, confirm the available entry surface first. Do not assume that a single feature unlock provides full scanning, every model, unlimited generation or every distribution service.

What does public pricing currently distinguish?

The Rankfor pricing page currently lists Marketer, Strategist and Enterprise. Marketer’s public plan description includes Index, AI visibility, persona intelligence and content plans. Strategist adds capabilities including Dice Roller test, Topic Explorer and competitive intelligence, with greater listed seat and project capacity. Enterprise is a custom offer. Use the live page for the exact comparison and commercial terms.

Record the billing cadence shown when you make the decision. Annual-billed monthly equivalents should not be confused with a month-to-month contract. Taxes, add-ons, renewal and any applicable cancellation terms also belong in the purchase record. Public prices and feature labels can change; a saved comparison should state its review date and link back to the authoritative page.

How should capacity be assessed?

Count the brands or sites that genuinely need separate projects, the people who need authorized access and the workspaces required by your operating model. Then check the offered capacity and actual account configuration. Do not infer archival behavior, automatic slot reuse or unlimited switching from a numeric project allowance. Ask for written confirmation where the purchasing decision depends on those behaviors.

For illustration, an agency with three active client audits may need different project capacity from a single-brand editorial team, even if both generate similar content. A team that needs Dice Roller Test should verify that feature is available in the contemplated plan.

The example identifies a requirement; it does not establish that any particular plan pays for itself or that every account has identical allowances.

How do you make the decision reviewable?

Use a requirement table with job, feature, capacity, confirmed entitlement, cost basis and unresolved question. Test the most important workflow when access permits. For Dice Roller, evaluate whether the team can define and inspect repeated claims; for content plans, assess whether the resulting brief supports a useful editorial decision. A demonstration should make the requirement concrete, not replace the commercial terms.

Choose the smallest arrangement that meets the documented work and leaves a sensible route for changed needs. Set a review date tied to actual usage and outputs. If the team repeatedly needs an unavailable feature or reaches a justified capacity limit, that is evidence for a different plan. More favorable model answers alone are not a contractual property of a higher subscription tier.